MH370 UAP Videos: Debunking the Nonsense.

by Ken S last updated Dec.5th, 2023

MH370 UAP Videos

The recent renewed interest and discovery of these MH370 UAP videos has sparked much debate about the authenticity of these videos and whether, or not, they are real or were manipulated/edited in any way. After studying these videos for several months and helping to prove these videos are real I would like to clear up some misconception and misinformation that is being circulated on the net which I find to be false and misleading and doesn't do the truth any favors.

When we begun to prove these videos were real we started with knowing just the coordinates in the satellite video, I theorized that if this plane is MH370 then this plane would have been turning around 18:40 UTC the time the MH370 Inmarsat BFO data indicates this plane changed direction based on the changing BFO values due to the Doppler effect. We also believed this plane would have been the only plane in the Andaman Sea at that time making its final major turn into the Southern Indian Ocean (SIO).This would have been the only passenger plane we know of that would have been flying in that area at that time.

NROL-22      8.828815, 93.195896

By using the coordinates of the video and time of the BFO change (turn 18:40 UTC) we were able to locate a NASA satellite image that was taken on that day March 7th, 2014 at ~18:54 UTC at these coordinates some 14 minutes after turn time (18:40 UTC)  in video. After doing careful comparisons between the cloud patterns in the satellite image and those in the video I found 18 points of similarity between these patterns which indicates to me these are the same clouds thus the videos are real. You can't easily fake that.

NASA Satellite Image taken on March 7th, 2014 at around 18:54 UTC

Screen capture from drone FLIR video

If this was all CGI I doubt very much the hoaxster would have known or had access to this satellite image to have modelled the clouds in his animation to match the actual clouds that were in that area that night. This possibility seems to improbable for me to believe and thus these videos must be real and that plane must be the plane transmitting this Inmarsat data that night in that area believed to be MH370.

After this discovery it became crystal clear to me these videos are real but there's a problem. If this is the plane that was transmitting this Inmarsat data that data tells us this plane flew for another 5 hrs 39 min after making that turn so how could it fly through a portal and vanish in the Andaman Sea at around ~18:47 UTC? If MH370 went through a portal in the Andaman Sea the last 6 pings of the Inmarsat data would not exists nor would the witness Kate Tee have seen this plane at ~19:00 UTC. Since these last 6 pings do exists and we know this Inmarsat data is valid and correct then we must conclude the portal in video has to be fake. You can't just ignore the rest of the Isat data that you used to prove the video is real and then say the rest of data is wrong because the portal is real, You can either believe in the data or the portal but both can't be true. It obvious to me what is real here is the Inmarsat data and that portal is fake.

There is no way this Inmarsat data could have been manipulated nor fabricated because it was being downloaded on to multiple databases in real-time, Like Inmarsat said, "the data is fine so long as no one spoofed it". By spoof they mean providing there was not another aircraft using the same AES ID as MH370's Satellite Data Unit (SDU).

The U.S. does not have advance teleportation technology and this video is certainly is not proof of this, It's more proof the CIA have a pretty good VFX team and Mick West is probably right this VFX portal was from a 1990s video game. Although these videos are real this part of the videos must be CGI.

Watch this video. VFX Frame Comparison: Too similar to be coincidence.

I am certain this portal is just VFX effect stock footage that was also used in this TV episode of 'Eastbound and Down'. We know that the portal in this video must be fake so why would it not be fake in the UAP videos as well? Watch the video here.

It is my belief everything else in this video is real including the orbs. I believe the orbs are the reason these videos were recorded in the first place because it's a stunning piece of UAP footage. I believe the unedited video would just show the plane continuing to fly south while the orbs zip off to the right of the plane, no portal. In the subsequent frames the plane is simply removed from the video to create the illusion it vanished into a portal.

The NHI (non human intelligence) probably were just curious as to why that plane was flying in that area or wanted to see if it posed any threat to them. Since I am not one of them I can only speculate as to why they were interested in this plane but the Inmarsat data shows they didn't teleport it anywhere.

I believe the reason the portal was added to videos was to stigmatize the videos and make it easy to dismiss them as a complete hoax or to mislead others into believing it's all real and aliens made the plane vanished or the US has a fantasy teleportation weapon. Whatever the reason for leaking these videos I know with certainty that they're real and someone edited them to give them easy deniability because they are classified videos.The reality of these videos is proof in my opinion that the CIA/U.S. DoD know allot more about what happened to this plane than they have stated so publically.

Ashton Forbes has been making false claims that Kate Tee saw this plane circulating counter-clockwise over her boat at 18:40 UTC. This is completely false because Kate's boat was over 254 Kms away from these video coordinates so at no time that day would she have seen a plane at that location. She did see this plane later as it was passing by her location at 18:53 UTC flying high directly south,

Here is a video of this phenomena called St.Elmo's Fire which can cause an aircraft's skin to illuminate because of friction of ash particles hitting the surface of the plane. If there were ash particles in the air these particle can scatter light and result in this orange tinting of the sky which would explain why this low flying plane was glowing orange at night. This is the same effect that forest fires have on the color of the sky (tinting orange) during daylight hours because of air pollution from the smoke. Because this was happening at night the sky would not be noticeably orange at that time because there is no sunlight but if the plane was being illuminated by friction from ash particles then this could logically explain why it appeared to be glowing orange. It is also possible that something on the external surface of the plane may have ignited and caught on fire as well possibly from an engine flame out or from heat from friction.

Kate did see a glowing orange plane that day but it was not the plane in UAP video and it was much later (19:10-19:25 UTC) see report. Ashton asserts the plane in UAP video is on fire and is glowing orange. He asserts the FLIR video is proof of this and sights the orange glow under plane as proof of this. The orange glow under the plane is actually the right engine hot air exhaust which is visible in this image because the engine hangs slightly lower than fuselage. I have looked at this video a hundred times now and the plane never looked on fire to me and those are contrails and not smoke trails. Ask any pilot this question.

Unlike gas vapors contrails are comprised of a trail of ice crystal caused by the rapid cooling of the engine exhaust vapors. These ice crystals would indeed reflect IR radiation and would be seen in the IR video as shown but gaseous smoke trails would not be detected. If the plane in UAP video was on fire smoking in an IR image we would not see the smoke trails which proves those are contrails in the video with ice crystals reflecting IR radiation. Reference

This plane in the video is not on fire and is flying above altitudes above 26,000ft. (temps below -36.5 C) because of the contrails and science tell us this, The cloud tops in this video are below 5250 ft (1600m) which means this plane is flying at least 20,000 ft above those clouds tops and to believe anything else is just an optical illusion.

Ashton falsely asserts that it was the satellite USA-229 took the UAP sat video however we can clearly see from the NASA satellite image and analyzing the clouds in video this video had to be taken from the west of the video coordinates in order to have that view of the clouds.

By studying the video coordinates ground track we can see for the video frame to be panning left to right and tilt downwards like the video the cameras would had to be either west or south of this ground track. USA-229 was to the east of this track so it is not possible this pair of satellites could have taken that UAP sat video.

Ashton falsely asserts that an oil rig worker Mike MacKay saw MH370 on fire from his oil rig in the South China Sea. This is false because he was ~750 Km from where MH370 was known to be on ADS-B radar at the time of his sighting.

 

I am all for people bringing attention to these UAP videos and bringing attention to this very important MH370 mystery that needs to be solved but you are not doing the truth any favors by spreading misinformation which has no basis in the facts and requires us to change the facts to make their theory even possible. Good theorists don't change the facts and block everyone who disagrees with them, they change their theories to match the facts and listen to those who disagree.

The bottom line here is that these videos are real but the portal is fake and the U.S. Gov. does not have any advance teleportation technology and these videos are certainly not proof of this. These videos are real authentic leaked videos and understanding them correctly and how they fit in with the rest of the data and MH370 facts will be critical for finding the truth about this plane. The truth is not obfuscation, it's reality  

Ken S

Twitter: @kstaubin 

Footnotes:

NASA Satellite Image was taken by the satellite Suomi NPP which has a minimum image resolution of 375 m of 5 bands and 750 m of 16 spectral bands. Source.

My other blogs on these UAP videos

The UAP Videos are REAL but not the VFX portal.

The MH370 UAP Satellite Video Is Not a Satellite Video!

MH370 UAP Video Analysis, the Proof is in the Clouds.