The Location of MH370 - A Reverse Drift Study Based On Debris Found

-
Last Updated Jan. 9th, 2024


Click here to see map.

Introduction

The following is a reverse drift study performed on all debris pieces found thus far in Africa which either are confirmed or believed to be from MH370. The objective of this study is to try to define the most common general area with the highest probability of being the point of origin of where all these debris pieces may have originated from in the Indian Ocean. This study ignores all other data and only uses the drift data from the drift tool (www.adrift.org.au) to determine all possible origin points of all the debris pieces based on their respective locations and estimated drift times at Sea.

The objective of this study is not to determine the precise location of where MH370 wreckage is but to define the general area of where our haystack is and where we should be looking for this plane. Reverse drift science is not a precise science and many factors such as winds, currents, time of year, and drift times affect how these debris pieces may have drifted in the Oceans. However reverse drift models have been proven accurate for telling us the most probable general areas of where debris in the Oceans originated from over time.

About Adrift.org.au.

Adrift.org.au is a free quick, easy tool to quantitatively study planktonic surface drift in the Global Oceans. The tool was created and is maintained by the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney, Australia under the direction of Oceanographers Eric van Sebille and Matthew H England. The technique used to track plastic around the ocean is based on the trajectories of surface drifters from the Global Drifter Program.  The trajectory information is used to form a transit matrix, which captures the statistics of drifter dispersion.  In total, more than 24 million locations from 17,494 individual surface trajectories and spanning a period between 1979 to 2013 are used on adrift.org.au.  

The data from each drift model can be downloaded from the website and loaded into an Excel spreadsheet. In this study I use the data generated from the web tool to create transit matrices for each reverse drift model.

How the study works.

Each piece of debris has a fixed known location and a discovery date.  By using the geographical coordinates of each debris piece and estimating the drift time of each piece based on its discovery date we can create a reverse drift model for each individual piece.  The drift times are determined in even number of months because the adrift web tool works in increments of 2 months only.  So if an object was discovered say 25 months after March, 8th, 2014 ( date of MH370 disappearance) then the drift time would be rounded off to the nearest even month prior to discovery (i.e. 24 months). Since we have no way of knowing the exact drift times of these objects this is the best we can do for estimating these drift times at Sea. I realize that this uncertainty in drift times may introduce some errors to some models but I do not think it will drastically affect the overall results of this study because it is very likely most of these pieces were discovered within 2 months after they washed ashore in most cases.

In each reverse drift model each possible origin point is assigned a weight by the adrift software between 0 and 1, with 1 being the highest probability. To visualize this in the models I use a bubble chart to show all possible origin points and their locations on the chart. The larger the bubble size is the higher probability it has.  Once all reverse drift models have been created for each debris piece the data from all models are then loaded into one composite reverse drift model which will shows us all the possible origin points for all debris pieces and which areas are common to all models and have the highest concentration of high probability origin points.  This area will be the area that most likely is the origin of all the debris found and where the wreckage of MH370 most likely is.

The advantage of using reverse drift modelling as opposed to forward drift modelling is that we do not have to predict a starting point of origin for each model. All forward drift models need to predict a starting point of where they suspect the plane may have crashed, usually somewhere along the 7th arc.  These studies have an inherent bias and assume that the Inmarsat data is valid.  In this reverse drift study we let the software try to determine as accurately as possible where this point of origin is without making any assumptions as to where this location of the plane is, therefore this reverse study in my opinion is far more objective and unbiased.

List of debris items found with their reverse drift models.

Below is a list of all debris items found thus far which are either confirmed or believed to be from MH370. Each item contains a link to their reverse drift model which can be clicked on to animate the model and show where the debris item may have originated from over time. Also included in each item is a graphic of the reverse drift model showing all origin points of each item at the specified drift time. The larger bubbles in these graphics show the locations which have highest probability.

Debris images and information courtesy of WLP twitter @Bookofresearch.

ITEM 1; Drift Time 16 months

ITEM #1

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-20.9&lng=55.7&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 16 months earlier.

 

ITEM 2: Drift Time 20 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-25.06&lng=33.69&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 20 months earlier.

ITEM 3: Drift Time 22 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-22.06&lng=35.52&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 22 months earlier.

ITEM 4: Drift Time 20 months

UPDATE (28-08-2016): This item was photographed in December 2015 on the beach in Mossel Bay. The item had barnacles on it which indicates the picture must have been taken shortly after it washed ashore. Because of this information this item could only have drifted at Sea not more than 21 months. The reverse drift model below was done for a 20 month drift time period. I have updated the reverse drift model for this item as well as the results section on this blog.

Here is a link to the news report which shows this photograph: http://masterherald.com/flight-mh370-engine-cowling-found-near-mossel-bay-in-south-africa-was-covered-in-barnacles-and-could-not-have-been-planted-new-photo-suggests/40252/

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-34.50&lng=22.15&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 20 months earlier.

ITEM 5: Drift Time 24 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-19.74&lng=63.47&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 24 months earlier.

ITEM 6: Drift Time 24 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-25.06&lng=33.92&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 24 months earlier.

ITEM 7: Drift Time 24 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-26.39&lng=32.93&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 24 months earlier.

ITEM 8: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-20.02&lng=57.7&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 9: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-25.86&lng=32.75&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 10: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-20.52&lng=57.54&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 11: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.75&lng=50.0&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 12: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.75&lng=50.0&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 13: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.80&lng=49.98&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 14: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.79&lng=49.98&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 15: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.84&lng=49.96&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 16: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.84&lng=49.78&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 17: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.85&lng=49.81&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 18: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-16.85&lng=49.81&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 19: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-5.10&lng=39.84&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 20: Drift Time 26 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-26.89&lng=32.88&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 26 months earlier.

ITEM 21: Drift Time 28 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-27.24&lng=32.79&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 28 months earlier.

ITEM 22: Drift Time 28 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-29.72&lng=31.09&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 28 months earlier.

ITEM 23: Drift Time 28 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-23.924&lng=35.53&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 28 months earlier.

ITEM 24: Drift Time 28 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-23.76&lng=35.43&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 28 months earlier.

ITEM 25: Drift Time 24 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-25&lng=47&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 24 months earlier.

ITEM 26: Drift Time 24 months

http://www.adrift.org.au/backward?lat=-25&lng=47&center=79.2&startmon=Jan

Reverse drift model showing all possible origin points of this item 24 months earlier.

 

Results of reverse drift analysis.

Based on the results of these drift models the following observations can be made:
1- Several of these reverse drift models (Item 2, Item 3, item 4, Item 6, Item 7, Item 9) show 0% probability of originating from the current ATSB seabed search area. Therefore this area cannot possibly be the location of where MH370 crashed.
2- The reverse drift models for Items 2 and item 4 shows 0% probability that it could have originated from anywhere near the 7th arc in a 20 month drift time period. If the drift time is closer to 22 months then there is only a low probability it could have originated from the 7th arc above 20S and in Sumatra area. This piece also shows no or very low probability of originating from the Maldives as well thus eliminating that area as the possible point of origin for all the debris pieces.

3- Most of the reverse drift models show a greater probability of originating closer to the Equator than anywhere near the 7th arc. In fact most of the reverse drift models only show a low probability of originating from the 7th arc at all.
4- The graphic below is a composite reverse drift model containing all the drift data of all the reverse drift models in this study and shows all origin points for all debris items. It should be noted that some origin points which have very low weight become so small that they are simply not visible in this graphic. The area which best satisfies and is consistent with all reverse drift models and shows the highest concentration of high probability origin points is shown in the red box. This area is close to the Equator near Indonesia and covers an area between Longitude 80E and 95E and between Latitude 8N and 7S. Areas outside this red box that show high probability are not consistent with all the reverse drift models in this study therefore these areas can be excluded as being the point of origin for all debris pieces. Only the origin points inside this red box are consistent with all reverse drift models and show the highest probability of being the origin point of all this debris found in Africa.


The most probable place on Earth where MH370 wreckage most likely is, in this red zone.



Based on this data and the results in this study this area indicated in the red box is the most likely area where MH370 wreckage will be found and where all the debris in Africa most likely originated from.

 

This excerpt from Jeff Wise's blog shows that French officials in this leaked French Judiciary Report reached a similar conclusion as to the origin of the flaperon piece and MH370's wreckage.  -  French Judiciary Report Raises Fresh Doubts About MH370 Debris

Click on image below to see report:



Where is MH370? - GEOMAR  https://www.geomar.de/en/news/article/wo-ist-mh370/


What is particularly interesting about this area is that it includes the location of where possible aircraft debris was captured by satellite.  The yellow dot in the graphic above, inside the red box, indicates the location of where this debris was spotted. The image below is the satellite image that captured this debris by a DigitalGlobe satellite on March 16th, 2014 which shows 5 pieces of debris that look very similar and match in size, shape, and appearance to parts of a B777-200ER aircraft.



Here is a link to the original satellite image posted on Tomnod. Just click on the 'X" in the intro message to see image. If you zoom out you will see that there were 100s, if not 1000s, of small debris pieces in this area:  http://www.tomnod.com/campaign/mh370_indian_ocean/map/163x4rye

For more info and images on this sighting please visit this blog.

What is also interesting about this area is that there was an eye witness named Mrs. Raja Latife Dalelah who was onboard a flight from Jedda in Saudi Arabia to Kuala Lumpur on March 8th, 2014. She reported seeing an aircraft like object floating in the Andaman Sea at 2:30 PM MYT ( 6:30 UTC). The graphic below shows where her sighting occurred which is directly North of where debris in the satellite photo was captured on March 16th, 2014. Ocean currents in this part of the Andaman Sea tend to flow from North to South so it is very possible she may have seen this debris 8 days earlier on the 8th of March just after the plane crashed there.

Here is a link to a blog on Raja's report.




My belief is that the plane broke apart into several large pieces with hundreds, if not thousands of smaller pieces floating on the surface and drifted towards the South.  I believe that after the debris was captured by satellite on the 16th the debris field  continued to drift South for several more days eventually with the large pieces becoming water logged and sinking near the Equator and the rest of the smaller surface debris ( flotsam ) drifting towards Africa.

Forward Drift Model
Below is a forward drift model whose origin point is close to where this debris was spotted and shows how debris from this location could have drifted towards Africa. This forward drift model also explains why no debris has shown up on the shores of Australia. Here is a forward drift model from adrift.org.au starting at Lat 4.5N Long 90.7E in the month of March.
http://www.adrift.org.au/map?lat=4.5&lng=90.7&center=96.2&startmon=Mar


Forward Drift Model: Click on image to animate.  The Model shows why debris in southeast Africa only started showing  between 16- 24 months and why no MH370 debris has been found in Australia.

MP4 video click here:
 

Flaperon Barnacle Data: Click on image to animate



MP4 video click here:

In a study by scientist Patrick De Deckker of the Lepas anatifera barnacles found on the Flaperon piece which washed ashore on Reunion Island the study concludes the following;

"The start of the growth was around 24 degrees (Celsius) and then for quite some time, it ranged between 20 and 18 degrees (Celsius). And then it went up again to around 25 degrees."

Based on this forward drift model (see above) and this animated GIF of Sea Surface Temperatures we can see how the flaperon may have drifted from warmer waters (>24C)  near Sumatra into cooler waters (18-20 C) between 10S and 30S and then into warmer waters (25 C) near Reunion Island. This forward drift model seems to be consistent with De Deckker's findings.

Here is a link to a another barnacle study done by the University of South Florida and here are their findings on these barnacles attached to the flaperon piece.


Click on image below to animate and see Sea Surfaces Temperatures (SST) by month



This drift study does not attempt to explain why the most probable origin area seems to contradict the Inmarsat data other than to say it is my belief that the Inmarsat data may have been compromised in some way. For more on my opinion on this please read my other blogs listed below.

As new debris pieces in the future are discovered I will be periodically updating this model. As time goes by the drift models become increasingly more complex and more dispersed therefore these reverse drift models over longer periods of drift time tend to become less accurate. Having said that I do not expect that these newer discoveries will have any great effect on the overall results in this study.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Based on the results in this study I highly recommend that the ATSB immediately terminate its seabed search in the Southern Indian Ocean. There is no way that all these pieces found in Africa came from anywhere near that search zone. To continue that search would only be a waste of more time and money.

I recommend to the Governments of Australia, Malaysia, and China that a new search zone be defined off the coast of Indonesia starting at these coordinates ( 4.63N, 90.72E )  where possible aircraft debris was captured in satellite imagery. I believe that this debris drifted south for several more days with the large pieces eventually becoming water logged and sinking somewhere near the Equator south of these coordinates. This is where the bulk of the wreckage should be found and the debris which remained on the surface ( flotsam ) drifted from this area and eventually ended up in Africa based on the analysis of this model.

It is my hope that a new search area be created in the area defined in this study based on the physical debris evidence, Ocean drift science, satellite imagery data, and eye witness reports and not based on vague, imprecise, and possibly compromised Inmarsat data. For the sake of the 239 families of the passengers onboard and the travelling public at large we must find this plane no matter what the cost.  Failure in this case is not an option.

 

Cheers,

Ken S

Twitter @kstaubin

References and Data.

Here is my Excel spreadsheet including all data used in this study. 

Erik van Sebille, Faculty of Science, University if New South Wales Sydney : report

Plastic Adrift website.

Interactive debris map.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MH370: The Unspeakable Truth.

-
Image
Updated December 29th, 2023 By Ken St. Aubin Introduction On March 8th, 2014 the passenger aircraft MH370, flying to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur, and it's 239 passengers and crew simply vanished into the night without a trace and 9 years later the public and grieving family members still don't know exactly what happened to that plane or their relatives. The only solid physical evidence that has been found of this plane is about 30 plus pieces of it's debris that has washed ashore on the shores of eastern Africa. What happened to this plane has become aviation's greatest mystery. MH370 After a several year hiatus from doing research on MH370 and blogging about it I decided I would revisit and review my 5 years of research that I did on MH370 from day one  (March 8th, 2014) when the plane disappeared to about 2019 and try to explain again my reasoning and evidence/data in a more clearer and less speculative way as to why I believe this plane was deliberately hijacked by sta...
Read more

MH370 UAP Video Analysis, the Proof is in the Clouds.

-
Image
Updated Dec. 7th, 2023 MH370 UAP Satellite Video MH370 UAP FLIR video It is believed that the plane in these UAP videos may be related to the disappearance of MH370 and if that is the case then the timestamp on the video, which is not shown in the video, should be around the time this plane MH370 is believed to have turned south in the Andaman Sea flying into the SIO on the evening it disappeared. Also the GPS position of the plane which is indicated in the video to be around this location (8.828815, 93.195896) should correspond, to some degree, with the predicted flight path indicated by the Inmarsat data. The correct timestamp for when this plane that was turning south in the Andaman Sea that was transmitting this Inmarsat data, believed to be MH370, is ~07/03/2014 18:40 UTC or 08/03/2014 02:40 MYT. That is the approx. time according to the Inmarsat BFO data for MH370 of where this plane was changing direction and moving away from the Inmarsat satellite. Before this time the BFO valu...
Read more

How Was MH370 Hijacked by a Third Party?

-
Image
Last Updated Nov. 1st, 2023 On July 30th, 2018 the Malaysian Investigative team, looking into the disappearance of MH370, released their report on MH370 and their findings into it's disappearance.  In the press conference the lead investigator, Kok Soo Chon , said that investigators were "not of the opinion" the pilots did this and yet they seemed convinced that the most likely reason for the plane's diversion from it's flight path was the result of manual inputs, meaning this was a deliberate act and not the result of a system failure. Investigators also said they could not find any plausible system failure that would explain this diversion. Although the investigators did not find any evidence that someone else was controlling the aircraft other than the pilots they could not rule out the possibility of an unlawful intervention by a "third party".   Investigators dismissed the possibility of a remote takeover of the aircraft because the autopilot on...
Read more

MH370: The Mysterious Case of the Radar Data.

-
Image
- Updated Nov. 2nd, 2023 On July 30th 2018 the Malaysian Air Crash Investigation Team looking into the disappearance of MH370 released their latest Factual Information Report which contained new, and important information, about the Military radar data track which authorities believe is MH370. This new radar data contained information on the speed and altitude values of this detected aircraft (blip) which was seen on their military radar shortly after MH370's disappeared from civilian SSR radar. The Radar Data The data shows a detected aircraft (blip) reported flying across the Malaysian peninsula at altitudes ranging  between 24450 ft and 47500ft flying towards Penang and then flying at 44,700ft near Penang and several minutes later reaching altitudes of 58200 ft and then descending drastically in altitude to 4800ft near Pulau Perak. The radar data then shows the plane ascended back up to the an altitude of 29500 ft before disappearing from radar. When investigators studie...
Read more

Was the disappearance of MH370 a CIA false flag operation?

-
Image
Last Updated Oct, 28th, 2023 DISCLAIMER: The following is just a theoretical opinion, a theory, based on my own knowledge of events, news reports, factual evidence, and my own research.  I do not expect people to read this as a factual report but simply as my own personal theoretical opinion. Seychelles Africa, February 2014   Two American ex-Navy Seals, who worked for the maritime security company Trident Group , assigned to guard the ship Maersk Alabama and it's cargo from pirates, Jeffrey Reynolds and Mark Kennedy, were found dead in a cabin on-board the ship on February 18th, 2014.  Both men were reported to have died of respiratory failure and possible heart attacks. A local pathologist concluded that Mr. Reynolds’s and Mr. Kennedy’s heart failures “had been as a result of a combination of heroin and alcohol consumption,” the police said in a statement. Mark Kennedy           ...
Read more

MH370 UAP Videos: Debunking the Nonsense.

-
Image
by Ken S last updated Dec.5th, 2023 MH370 UAP Videos The recent renewed interest and discovery of these MH370 UAP videos has sparked much debate about the authenticity  of these videos and whether, or not, they are real or were manipulated/edited in any way. After studying  these videos for several months and helping to prove these videos are real I would like to clear up some misconception and misinformation that is being circulated on the net which I find to be false and misleading and doesn't do the truth any favors. When we begun to prove these videos were real we started with knowing just the coordinates in the satellite video, I theorized that if this plane is MH370 then this plane would have been turning around 18:40 UTC the time the MH370  Inmarsat  BFO data indicates this plane changed direction based on the changing BFO values due to the Doppler effect. We also believed t his plane would have been the only plane in the Andaman Sea at that time making its fi...
Read more

The UAP Videos are REAL but not the VFX portal.

-
Image
Last Updated Jan.11th, 2024. The UAP videos are just one piece of the larger MH370 puzzle. To me the debate as to whether these videos are all CGI or real is over, the videos are real however the portal is fake. The reason I believe the videos are real is because of my previous  research  which proves the clouds in video match an actual NASA sat image taken at those coordinates on that day, at that location, at that time. You can't fake that easily, the clouds don't lie.  So if we accept the premise the videos are real then if this is the plane that was transmitting this Inmarsat data then that data tells us this plane flew for another 5 hrs 32 mins after it turned at 18:47 UTC into SIO. Therefore this data and Kate Tee's sighting of a high flying plane heading south (~19:00 UTC) proves the VFX portal in this video must be fake. If this plane went through a portal in the Andaman Sea the last 6 pings of the Inmarsat data would not exist so since they do exist that should t...
Read more

What Really Happened to MH370? The Witness Stories.

-
Image
Last Updated Nov. 19th, 2023 INTRODUCTION This theoretical MH370 flight path model is based on ear and eye witness reports that were reported by various witnesses who believe they saw. or heard MH370 on March 8th, 2014, as well as satellite imagery and logical speculation based on these reports. After studying these witness reports for the last year I have become convinced there must be some truth to the story these witnesses are telling us. This cannot be just a coincidence that when you just happen to layout 30+ random witness reports on a map, and look at them in chronological order by geographical location , they seem to describe a flight path of a plane, that looked very much like MH370 to them.  Hard to imagine that all these witnesses saw a mirage, or  just happen to see another commercial jetliner flying at low altitude on fire at same time MH370 goes missing and some world airline forgot to report that incident to the public. More likely the jet these witnesses s...
Read more

MH370: Stop Blaming the Data.

-
Image
Last Updated: Nov.25th, 2023 These UAP videos are believed to show the plane, believed to be MH370, that was transmitting this Inmarsat data on the evening this plane disappeared in the Andaman Sea on March 7th, 2014 UTC. See my previous research  here . The Inmarsat Data Since the Inmarsat data  was released back in April 2014 the provenance of this data has been questioned and contested. Many skeptics believe this data was somehow fabricated or manipulated by someone, somehow, to deceive investigators and the public. Others, such as myself, believe the data is completely authentic data but was being spoofed from another aircraft (decoy) to also mislead investigators, while there are those who believe the data is also authentic and believe it was not spoofed and was being transmitted by MH370 which most experts believe is the case. The subject of this Inmarsat data being fabricated or manipulated by someone has been debated for years. When you know that this data was being do...
Read more

Why do these MH370 UAP Videos matter if they're a hoax?

-
Image
Why do these MH370 UAP Videos matter if they're a hoax? by Ken S @kstaubin on X Last updated June 1st, 2024 This is a question I get asked alot from people on X. I have to acknowledge that this a valid question to ask since I do believe myself these videos are a hoax in the sense that this plane never teleported into a portal. I am pretty certain that this aspect of these two videos is nothing other than an added shockwave VFX stock asset from the 1990s  Pyromania! Pro (VCE)(1997)  CD-rom based on my own analysis, and those of others, and the fact that MH370 Inmarsat data that was being transmitted we believe from this plane in the UAP videos had to have flown for another 5 hours and 30 mins after it made that turn in the Andaman Sea that night so no way did it go through a portal if that Inmarsat data is authentic and these videos are real footage of that plane. Video courtesy of  @cryshlee on X This is my analysis of the MH370 UAP Videos Inmarsat Data Predicted Flight ...
Read more